"Where else would you go when you have an ax to grind?"

Sunday, March 04, 2012

Harper's the One

What the hell are those things on the side of Dean Del Mastro's head? They can't be ears, because he clearly isn't listening to a word that is being said to him. Del Mastro is probably sitting down in the video linked above because he has been spinning so much lately, he is too dizzy to stand up. What a maroon.

As Stephen Lautens pointed out on Twitter the other day, the Tory have a sort of standard response anytime they get their tails caught in a crack. I've amended his list slightly:

  1. It's a smear
  2. It's not worthy of a reply
  3. It's a rogue
  4. But...But...ADSCAM!
  5. Look over there! A shiny object!
  6. The Liberals did it/the Liberals did it first
  7. But the NDP are SOSHILUSTS! OMG!
  8. Sure it happened, but REAL Canadians don't care about all this insider political stuff, just ask Don Cherry
  9. Prove it, copper!
  10. Everyone does it
  11. Plead guilty and pay a fine

Let me be perfectly clear, and I'll use small words so people like Del Mastro can understand.   There is nothing wrong with using robocalls to ask for support for your party, whether the calls come from Canada, the United States or Timbuckfreakingtu.
The only time the point of origin becomes an issue is when the calls contain illegal content, because if the company making the calls is outside the country, it is more difficult to compel them to provide information to investigators.

Calling voters and claiming to be from Elections Canada or claiming to be calling on behalf of a party other than the one paying you, is ILLEGAL.
Lying to voters with the intention of preventing them from voting is ILLEGAL.

With the vast number of ridings now reporting illegal calls intended to suppress the vote, it is becoming clear that it this could only have been put together by someone with access to significant amounts of both money and data. It is also pretty clear that the vast majority of the illegal calls across the country were made to try to suppress the votes of identified Liberal supporters, with NDP supporters being a secondary target. The fact that a handful of identified CPC supporters now claim to have received such calls is irrelevant. Why are they only coming forward now? Why are there so few of them and so many complaints from Liberal and NDP supporters?

In investigating a crime, one looks at who had means and motive. The Conservative Party of Canada has a massive database of voter information going back several elections. Their people regularly brag about it. They have shown, at the highest levels of the party, their willingness to break election law in the past. They had the means and the motive. It is simply a matter of finding the fingerprints on the knife sticking out of the back of democracy at this point.

Do not be misled or confused by the ink the CPC is spraying like a frightened octopus. Do not let them sidetrack you with arguments about whether Elections Canada has received 31,000 complaints or 31,000 contacts or 30,999. Do not be misled or confused by the endless speculating on who 'Pierre Poutine' is or might be. He will be found eventually. There is a going to be a paper trail of some kind. The people directly involved in the illegal calls in Guelph and other Kitchener area ridings will eventually be identified.
In looking at the local players in CPC politics and the history of ratfucking among a few of these Segeretti wannabes, I have my suspicions about who might have been involved. And no, I'm not going to name any names so the aforementioned ratfuckers can stop dialling their lawyers for now.
Do not be misled when the culprits are finally identified and the Prime Minister and his inner circle of advisors and cabinet colleagues all disavow any knowledge. That is how espionage works  -- when you or members of your team are captured - the secretary will deny any knowledge etc etc. This was not done by a few rogue operatives, working on their own without supervision of any kind. There will be an apparent organizational firewall of plausible deniability. Some of the people at the sharp end of things may even be prosecuted.
But do not for one instant think that the final responsibility for this does not lie with Stephen Harper. He is the King Ratfucker.
This is his crime in the same way that Watergate was Nixon's crime.
At worst, he personally ordered it done and chose the people who executed the plan. At the very least, he fostered an attitude within the party that winning - by any means necessary - was all that mattered, chose the managers of the people who committed these crimes and completely and utterly failed to exercise any oversight, supervision or leadership.
In the end, it doesn't really matter where Harper's actions or lack of them fall on that scale. He is the leader and a leader is responsible for the actions of the people he leads.
If he had a right or honourable bone in his body, he'd admit that and resign immediately.
But what do we get?
Stephen Harper first claiming the Liberals did it and finally, if not in so many words, saying "Prove it, copper!"



democommie said...

Dear Mr. Reverend Paperboy, Sir:

I have, for the umpteenish time to, apologize for not being a more better correspondent at thishereblog.

I read this and thought to myself:

"HAH, and the Candahoovians said that they couldn't learn from US. Looks like Mr. Harper is well on his way to being a bigger shitstain than Georgie the Deuce.

Keep rubbin' their noses in it.

I had a nasty set-to with some reichwing fuckwad (I know, that's pretty much ALL of 'em) monday last and mused about it at my house.

I trust that you and yours are enjoying a fine mild winter up there in Snowistan.

Beijing York said...

Bravo, Rev!

A friend of mine involved with Democratic Party campaigning in the US says that this electoral fraud looks like the kind of work that was introduced by Karl Rove.

Based on what Impolitical reported earlier, there might be an "In and Out" element to this story in terms of who financed the phone bank calls (and I suspect the robocalls as well).

RossK said...


You've got both the subjectives and the objectives firing on all cylinders to get the true 'big picture' mojo working here.

Just like the good Docktor ordered.*

As BY said above...'Bravo!'


(not to mention Mr. Gilliard)


Holly Stick said...

Here's a link to a photo of the "political superweapon":


Zorpheous said...

Unfortunately for the CPC the demographics of the people targeted be the robocalls clearly points to non-CPC supporters, the only political CIMS database that would have generated this list would be from a Pro-CPC support databases.

Given the current knowledge of the CPC CIMS system we know that riding workers can only pull and push info for their riding.

No matter how the CPC want to spin this, it still ends up pointing to someone in their organization that had National Campaign access security to the system.

Now the question that remains is this, did person operate on their own, or did they co-ordinate this operation with local riding offices?

Either way, there should be real legal charges and a court case to resolve this crime against Canadian Democracy.

Anonymous said...

I see that you are trying to make things simple for Mr. Del Maestro. I see that you are trying to keep the syllables to a minimum in order to increase comprehension, but there is a problem with your explanation, vis-à-vis the CPC brain. You see, oh, how shall one say directly, ah yes, there are too many words.

Saskboy said...

Your words have been mistaken for Harper's, with my accidental assistance, when confused or malicious readers posted a quote and attributed it to Harper.

moeburn said...

Just thought I'd let you know, someone took your quote, attributed it to Stephen Harper himself talking about someone else in 2005, and spread it all over the interwebs.